Transform country relationships into an interactive diplomatic network showing alliances, tensions, and trade flows
The system analyzes relationship keywords (alliance, conflict, trade, partnership) and numerical strength indicators (1-10 scale) from your input. Green lines indicate alliances, red shows tensions or conflicts, blue represents trade relationships, and yellow marks neutral diplomatic ties. Line thickness corresponds to relationship strength, with thicker lines showing stronger connections.
Yes, if you include temporal data (years, dates, or periods) in your prompt, the visualizer creates an animated timeline showing how diplomatic relationships evolved. It can display alliance formations, conflict escalations, trade agreement implementations, and shifting regional influences through time-based animations.
The tool visualizes military alliances, trade partnerships, diplomatic tensions, territorial disputes, economic sanctions, defense pacts, regional organizations membership, bilateral agreements, and spheres of influence. It can incorporate GDP data, military spending, trade volumes, and diplomatic event timelines.
The system uses a force-directed layout algorithm that naturally clusters countries with strong mutual relationships. It identifies regional powers based on the number and strength of connections, creating visual hubs around influential nations. Geographic proximity and regional organization memberships also influence clustering patterns.
Absolutely. Policy analysts can visualize current diplomatic landscapes, identify relationship gaps, analyze alliance networks, and understand ripple effects of diplomatic changes. The interactive nature allows exploration of different diplomatic scenarios and their potential impacts on regional stability.
Hovering over country nodes displays comprehensive data including GDP, population, government type, military expenditure, trade balance, number of diplomatic missions, international organization memberships, recent diplomatic events, and a calculated diplomatic influence score based on network centrality.